Dismissal procedures

We consider the key areas that can be involved in employee dismissal, whether it is looking at statutory procedure, possible unfair dismissal claims or simply the right to dismiss an employee.

We highlight the main principles involved in the dismissal of employees including some common mistakes that employers make. If you are an employer in the Finsbury Park, London area we, at C Charles & Co Ltd, can provide you with assistance or any additional information required.

Since April 2024, several legislative changes have impacted UK employment law, particularly concerning dismissal procedures.

The Employment Rights Bill 2024 introduced unfair dismissal protection from the first day of employment, eliminating the previous two-year qualifying period.

An employee's employment can be terminated at any time but unless the dismissal is fair the employer may be found guilty of unfair dismissal by an Employment Tribunal.

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023, effective from 26 October 2024, introduced employer liability for third-party harassment, such as by customers or clients, emphasising the need for preventive measures.

We set out below the main principles involved concerning the dismissal of employees including some common mistakes that employers make. We have written this factsheet in an accessible and understandable way but some of the issues may be very complicated.

Professional advice should be sought before any action is taken.

The right to dismiss employees

Reasons for a fair dismissal would include the following matters:

  • the person does not have the capability or qualification for the job (this requires the employer to go through consultation and/or disciplinary processes)
  • the employee behaves in an inappropriate manner (the company/firm’s policies should refer to what would be unreasonable behaviour and the business must go through disciplinary procedures)
  • redundancy, providing there is a genuine business case for making (a) position(s) redundant with no suitable alternative work, there has been adequate consultation and there is no discrimination in who is selected
  • the dismissal is the effect of a legal process such as a driver who loses his right to drive (however, the employer is expected to explore other possibilities such as looking for alternative work before dismissing the employee)
  • some other substantial reason.

Claims for unfair dismissal

As there is now no required qualifying period, employees can make a claim to an Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal within six months of the date of the dismissal and if an employee can prove that he/she has been pressured to resign by the employer he/she has the same right to claim unfair dismissal or constructive dismissal.

Details of claims need to be submitted to ACAS for early conciliation where the parties will be offered pre-tribunal conciliation before proceeding to a Tribunal. However, there is no obligation of either party to take it up.

There are two levels of claim, depending on the complexity of the case. There is the straightforward claim where there is one claim per claimant or the more complex multiple claims (including unfair dismissal and discrimination claims)

If the claim proceeds to Tribunal and the employee wins his/her case the Tribunal can choose one of three remedies which are:

If the claim proceeds to Tribunal and the employee wins his/her case the Tribunal can choose one of three remedies which are:

  • reinstatement which means getting back the old job on the old terms and conditions
  • re-engagement which would mean a different job with the same employer
  • compensation where the amount can be anything from a relatively small sum to a maximum cap of 12 months' pay, which will apply where the amount is less than the overall cap. Where the dismissal was due to some form of discrimination the award can be unlimited.

If the dismissal is demonstrated as being due to any of the following it will be deemed to be unfair regardless of the length of service:

  • discrimination for age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation or marriage and civil partnership
  • pregnancy, childbirth or maternity leave
  • refusing to opt out of the Working Time Regulations
  • disclosing certain kinds of wrong doing in the workplace
  • health and safety reasons
  • assertion of a statutory right.

Statutory disciplinary procedures

The Employment Act 2008 introduced the ACAS Code of Practice which saw a change to the way employers deal with problems at work. It also saw the removal of 'automatic unfair dismissal' related to failure to follow procedures. Tribunals may make an adjustment of up to 25% of any award, where they feel the employer has unreasonably failed to follow the guidance set out in the ACAS Code.

The ACAS Code of Practice sets out the procedures to be followed before an employer dismisses or imposes a significant sanction on an employee such as demotion, loss of seniority or loss of pay.

The ACAS Code does not apply to redundancy or expiry of a fixed term contract.

Standard procedure

  1. Employers must set out in writing the reasons why dismissal or disciplinary actions against the employee are being considered. A copy of this must be sent to the employee who must be invited to attend a meeting to discuss the matter, with the right to be accompanied.
  2. A meeting must take place giving the employee the opportunity to put forward their case. The employer must make a decision and offer the employee the right to appeal against it.
  3. If an employee appeals, you must invite them to a meeting to arrive at a final decision.

There may be some very limited cases where despite the fact that an employer has dismissed an employee immediately without a meeting, an Employment Tribunal will very exceptionally find the dismissal to be fair. This is not explained in the regulations but may apply in cases of serious misconduct leading to dismissal without notice. What this means in practice awaits the test of case law.

Modified procedure

  1. Employers firstly set out in writing the grounds for action that has led to the dismissal, the reasons for thinking at the time that the employee was guilty of the alleged misconduct and the employee’s right of appeal against the dismissal.
  2. If the employee wishes to appeal against the decision, the employer must invite them to attend a meeting, with the right to be accompanied, following which the employer must inform the employee of their final decision. Where practicable, the appeal meeting should be conducted by a more senior or independent person not involved in the earlier decision to dismiss.

The only occasions where employers are not required to follow the ACAS Code of Practice are as follows:

  • they reasonably believe that doing so would result in a significant threat to themselves, any other person, or their or any other person’s property
  • they have been subjected to harassment and reasonably believe that doing so would result in further harassment
  • because it is not practicable within a reasonable period
  • where dismissal is by reason of redundancy or the ending of a fixed term contract
  • they dismiss a group of employees but offer to re-engage them on or before termination of their employment
  • the business closes down suddenly because of an unforeseen event
  • the employee is no longer able to work because they are in breach of legal requirements e.g. to hold a valid work permit.

Common mistakes that employers make

For many the regulations have caused some confusion and practical difficulties. Some of the most common mistakes include:

  • failure to invite employees to disciplinary hearings in writing or supply adequate evidence before the disciplinary hearing. The standard procedure requires the employer to set out the 'basis of the allegations' prior to the hearing
  • excluding dismissals other than disciplinary dismissals (e.g. ill-health terminations)
  • not inviting employees to be accompanied
  • not including a right of appeal
  • not appreciating the statutory requirement to proceed with each stage of the procedure without undue delay
  • failure to appreciate that an employee may have right to appeal even if it is requested verbally rather than in writing and is after a timescale set down by the employer
  • not appreciating that paying an employee a lower bonus for performance related reasons could potentially amount to ‘action short of dismissal’ by the employer
  • failure to treat as a grievance any written statement/letter (e.g. a letter of resignation) which raises issues which could form the basis of a tribunal claim to which statutory procedures apply. This means that the employer must be alert to issues being raised in writing even if there is no mention of the word grievance.

How we can help

If you are an employer in the Finsbury Park, London area we will be more than happy to provide you with assistance or any additional information required on dismissal procedures so please do contact us at C Charles & Co Ltd.

Latest News

Find out more
Find out more
Find out more

Testimonials

simon-dixon.jpg

After working with Nicholas Charles for a year, we brought him on to join our board advisory team for BankToTheFuture.com because of his unique combination of financial tax advice, commercial understanding and ability to introduce the right connections at the right time. Nicholas has provided tax advice to our investors, facilitated introductions to investors as well as help us to implement controls and procedures to get the right balance of compliance, responsible procedures and good business practices. If you want somebody that understands the commercials of business and deal making combined with the technical skills of finance, tax and increasing shareholder value, Nicholas Charles is your man.

Simon Dixon | CEO & Co-Founder BankToTheFuture.com
paul-strank.jpg

Nicholas has been an active supporter of our charity, and the Charles Group have sponsored our last three summer parties. He understands family businesses like ours but more importantly the need to give back to the local community and the life changing differences that can be brought about by charities. This is why we quickly became a client of the Charles Group. Nicholas appreciates that having a purpose greater than the individual needs of members can bring a family closer together as well as inspire the next generation. We admire Nicholas’ authentic approach towards Family Prosperity.

Paul Strank MBE and Irene Strank MBE | Founders of Paul Strank Roofing and the Paul Strank Charitable Trust
penny-power.jpg

I have worked with the Charles Group for 2 years on some very exciting projects and his ability to listen, provide objective advice and support my goals and ambitions has been a tremendous asset to me and my businesses. Nicholas cares deeply about those he works with and seeks to ensure great outcomes for all.

Penny Power OBE | Serial Entrepreneur
ehsen-shah.jpg

The Charles Group has been our trusted accountants since we founded B-Engaged in 2013. Over the years, they’ve become an integral part of our journey, consistently going above and beyond to help us save money, optimize our structures, and minimize tax liabilities. They are more than accountants—they are key partners in our success.

Ehsen Shah | Founder and CEO of B-Engaged: Sports Marketing Activations Agency
Gabby-Chrysanthou.jpg

From our early days as a startup to becoming one of the largest suppliers to Assos and River Island, The Charles Group has been a constant and invaluable partner. They’ve played a vital role in reducing our overheads, analysing and advising on client profitability, setting up our internal bookkeeping systems, and providing invaluable business guidance. Their expertise has also helped us manage and reduce our growing tax liabilities. The team at The Charles Group has truly become part of our business family.

Gabby Chrysanthou | Director and co-founder of Loaded London